Legal essay(family law) Essay

Evaluate the strong suit of the fairness in achieving arbiter for parties involved in kinship partition. mandate and faces strive to achieve justice for wholly parties involved in a kinship disruption. However, justice can be difficult to achieve as the natural law does non always uphold the rights of individuals. The law does reflect amicable and community values and strives to be accessible.Divorce is an exercise of the law cosmos soft enforced, while with disputes involving nestlingren soundness isnt always achieved. Amendments to order in a flash make the law more in effect(p) when dealing with relationship breakdowns between same sex couples and de facto relationships. Divorce is becoming more common in society, this means that legislation has been made more effective in achieving individuals rights. The Family Law consummation 1975 (cth) established no fault divide, as long as the couple is separate for 12months, that disturbed the Matrimonial Causes repr esent 1959 (Cth). Divorce is an effective method in achieving justice for parties involved in a relationship breakdown.An interpreter of this is in the case Pavey v Pavey 1976, this case established separate under one roof, this allowed couples to get a divorce even if they were living together due to financial strain. Pavey v Pavey is an example of how the law achieves justice for individuals and the accessibility of the law. Most issues related to relationship breakdown involves chelaren, legislation has been improved in recent years to overcome this, nevertheless there are still many cases where justice isnt achieved for all parties.The Child Support (assessment) Act 1984 (cth) aims to deduct money to support the child if the parent isnt living with them. The Federal Government in 1990 ratify the UNs Convention on the Rights of the Child. This ruled that all cases were to be lick in the scoop interests of the child. The Family Law Reform Act 1995 (Cth) recognises best intere sts of the child and also changes custody to residency and contact. This legislation has effectively achieved justice for families however, the best interests of the child and the confidence of overlap parenting outlined in the Family Law Amendment Act (Shared Responsibilities) Act 2006 (NSW) was overturned by the High Court.The High Court overturned best interests of the child in the case MRR V GR 2010, as shared out parenting wasnt reasonably practible and the rights of the individual was not being upheld. MRR v GR is an example of how legislation is not effective, but due to the responsiveness of the legal system, justice was achieved. The Family Law Amendment (Shared Responsibilities) Act 2006 (NSW) also created Family Relationship Centres that allowed families to resolve disputes and there is dictatorial 3 hours mediation in the breakdown of a marriage involving children. The law has been effective in achieving justice for parties involved in a relationship breakdown as it upholds community values, is accessible and responsive and aims to protect the rights of individuals.The law is also responsive in defend the rights of individuals through the media and lobby groups. foyer Groups such as Dads in Distress, aimed to establish shared parenting as they were ineffective to see their children. This lead to reforms in the Family Law Act with a presumption of shared parenting. However the media has given reports of children being at risk because of shared parenting. This is shown in the SMH report For the Sake of the Children. The law has to reflect communitys conflicting vales and therefore is not always effective in defend the rights of the individual.Unmarried couples also have to be protected in the resolution of a relationship breakdown and justice must be achieved. The billet (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW) defines de facto relationships and included same sex relationships in the definition. This act protects individuals in the situation of a rel ationship breakdown by identifying which parties get what. The SMH released an article, hithers an Idea that recognises de facto relationships as a valid choice and that they should be protected by the law.Through recent legislation reforms individuals rights are achieved, as well as the law being accessible. However, legislation is not always responsive, as de facto relationships were only defined in 1984, and they did not have the same rights as married couples until then. The law is effective in achieving justice for parties involved in a relationship breakdown. Divorce is easily accessible and responsive. Relationship breakdown including children is mainly effective in protecting the rights of individuals and upholding societal values. Through recent legislation developments the relationship breakdown of de facto relationships is directly treated the same as the dissolution of marriage. The law is mostly effective in achieving justice and protecting the rights of individuals in volved in a relationship breakdown.View as multi-pages