Professional Ethics Essay

1. Clearly, Dr. Conrad Hadenuf is not justified in his refusal to att close the tenderness abuse re-training program. His refusal to participate in the shop classs save because of his self-perceived gilt-edgedity and achievements shows his negative and unprofessional placement towards opportunities in improving his practice. His pretermit of sake and inactive participation during the workshop fitting showed a very disturbing theater of the lack of ethical responsibility to guests wherein Hadenuff displayed how opposed he is to learn more than the things he thinks he already knows.By dismissing the workshop as something that he does not need, Hadenuff as well as effectively deprives present and future clients with signification abuse problems with a practician who has an up meshingd friendship and skill in handling ticker abuse issues. Indeed, the very reason for the man of mandated continuing education as a requirement for license renewal is to countenance practitioner s to maximize available learning opportunities so they can enhance the quality of profit that they provide to clients.2. I will denote the Chinese client to someone else who is long-familiar with the Chinese culture as my lack of experience and knowledge of Chinese skill affect my energy to provide the client with the assistance and service that she needs. My unfamiliarity with the Chinese culture would clearly limit my capability to provide the client with quality counselor-at-law as my judgements and bias may progress into conflict with Chinese values and norms. I would also inform the client that the referral is creation made with her best interests in mind, and my limitations in understanding her background could impede my ability to assist her in coming up with an adequate and appropriate response to her problems.3. I think that both Amy and Augustus are organism unprofessional in their actions and attitudes. Both clearly had a weakness in establishing the halal boun daries for their relationship which has caused intimate feelings to be actual between them. Amy, as Augustus prof and private supervisor, should not be in possession of encouraged Augustus regard by giving him hope that it would end in a positive way. She should have told him right there and then that such(prenominal) a relationship would not wholly put her in a severe light among her colleagues and the institution she works for, provided also violates her sense of professional ethics.If I were Amys colleagues, I would advise her not to pursue the relationship as it is mad from the start. The uneven balance of power, wherein Augustus as a student, would tend to regard Amy as his superior by the mere fact that she was his professor and advisor, would clearly have an effect on an intimate relationship they are readying to have. It would not be appropriate for Amy and Augustus to date while the latter is still in the program, as it might have an tinct on other students percept ion of Augustus location and performance in the program, although it might be try forable once he has graduated.4. I would not agree with the administrations decision to keep my placement as a student intern from my clients. It would be highly unethical and unprofessional to be dishonest to clients about the extent of my abilities and accepted capacities. Clearly, the rationale of the administrators are unacceptable as it violates the clients right to full discretion of the temperament of service that they are being provided, including the status and the limitations of the counselor sent to them.By safekeeping the real status of my practice from my clients, I am violating their trust and confidence in my abilities and I could put them at chance for claiming to be a full-pledged counselling practitioner despite the truth. Thus, I would not accept the internship assignment of the community agency if evaluate it would mean that I would have to be dishonest and would have to viol ate my effectiveness clients right to full discretion of operate which is unethical and unprofessional for counselling practitioners.