Comparing the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire Essay -- Han Dynasty vs

The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were two grand empires that rose wine out of preexisting territories and provided relative peace over wide areas. The grant of the Qin Dynasty (221-206 BCE), which was the first great land-based empire in East Asia, came after a period of war, confusion, and tyrannical rule. Due to the political disorder that stemmed from the archaean dynastic activity, the emergence of the Han Dynasty (206 BCE- 228 CE) sprung to focus on restoring order. On the other hand, the boost of the Roman Empire (44 BCE- 476 CE) originated from consolidating authority over aristocratic landlords and overriding the elective elements of the earlier Republic. Instead, the Roman Empire redefined the concept of citizen as subjects to the Roman emperor. two empires shared similar agendas to exploit their vast territories and resources, which helped them expand their political mastery however, despite having similar political goals and foundations, their government system, cultural ideologies and imperial expansionist natures diverged.Both the Han and Roman empires emphasized on territorial expansions. By utilizing their aright militaries, they consolidated their power within and across borders, which created stable trade networks for their economic bases. Land equated to wealth and power. Through integration of the local domains, both empires succeeded in political stability. For the Han Empire, their expansion abroad pushed through ecological limits under emperor moth Wu Di ( 181-87 BCE), who make military service compulsory. The army expanded bordered into northern Vietnam and southeastern China. Although there were military threats from the Xiongnu, the nomadic people of the north, Wu launched defense attacks that made ... ... weaker state will remain neutral from a military strength. Melians acquittance reaffirms the absolute power of imperial conquests and nationalism in theories of realism. Since the Melians were allied with the Spartans and failed to cooperate, it is excusable that the Athenians had the right to want to rule and invade the Melians as means to value their own strengths.Works CitedGochberg, Donald S. World Literature and Thought. Fort Worth, TX Harcourt College, 1997. Print.Pomeranz, Kenneth, James Buchanan. Given, Laura Jane Mitchell, and Robert L. Tignor.Worlds Together, Worlds away A Companion Reader. New York W.W. Norton &, 2011. Print.Polybius, Rome at the End of the Punic Wars. Ancient History SourcebookPoetry of the Han DynastyThucydides, The Melian DebateTung Chung-Shu, Luxuriant Gems of the outpouring and Autumn Annals.