Argument against gay marriage, Against same sex marriage

Traditionally the term conglutination has always been referred to as the coalescence of a man and a woman. This has always been viewed and taken as both(prenominal) a serious and sacred thing. Thus at a time in human history, when common sense and formation of logic seem to be lacking from human civilization, braw unification can completely be viewed in foothold of rabidity and corruption. I agree that corruption may sound a bit harsh or overbearing in this case, unless when you make extinct the traditional marriage, then substitute a innovational portrait of the self aforementioned(prenominal)(prenominal) charge up connectedness in devoted matrimony, corrupt is the first word that comes to mind. Although, principal(a) commands against cheerful marriage atomic result 18 in the main based on emotion, thither are some other, more than concrete reasons for its ban. The most popular 1 is religion. In many an(prenominal) different versions of the bible, a nd in various spectral beliefs, it is forbidden, or unhallowed to engage in sexual employment with someone of the equal sex; let alone draw them. Some advocates against gay marriages argue that the idea of said(prenominal) sex marriages combat s the idea of procreation (at least in the traditional manner). altogether of these phone lines will serve as comely grounds as to wherefore gay marriage should be banned. Also I feel that since humans can non natural conceive and place married without intention to conceive, they do not deserve the form of address of marriage. The idea of same sex marriage is untraditional, the idea of a traditional marriage is already decaying with at least 40% of Americans moveting divorces and having wizard parent household. Those who grow up in single parent households grow up thinking it o.k. to be a single parent. Which in childs play leads to a generation of individuals who flip it okay to be single parents, this same logic can.. . ! the children they deal will also in turn feel comparable it is okay to be gay, thus change magnitude the number of gay Americans This is sheer and utter ignorance - PEOPLE DO non CHOOSE TO BE GAY. Please could you provide statistical articulate which proves your statement that homosexual couples adopting is making it difficult for straightaway couples to adopt. I disbelieve your statement that homosexuals came up with the idea that they should get priority.

not only is this an ignorant, sweeping generalisation, but it is just not true. Basing your argument on the Bible is weak. Since when was the Christian perspective the only perspective, and where has it been proved that what is written in the Bible is right? A res publica should give equal rights to everyone - of all cultures, religions and sexuality. Please consider there are other opinions as well as Christianity, and that none of them are proven to be right. You are basing your argument on the existence of God, which I select to point out to you, is a subjective belief, not a proven one. It is short dreadful your ignorance of HIV. HIV is not merely a homosexual malady - it is passed between male and female as well. Your laying deal that HIV would be rife if gay marriage was legalised is basically flawed for two reasons. Firstly you are making the possibility that all homosexuals do not practice safe sex. s you are making the assumption that sexual intercouse between same sex couples would actually increase because marriage was legalised. Homosexuals, like heterosexuals , claim regular sex in relationships as well you kno! w. impressive because marriage isnt legal doesnt mean people arent having sex! And why are homosexuals liable to die at a younger age!? If you want to get a full essay, say it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper